Case Study: Opt-in Email Lists Deliver Conversion Rates Up to 21-Times Those of Not-Opt-in Lists

Do opt-in email lists really perform better than non-opt-In lists? And, if they do, is the difference significant?

Based on my 25+ years in the industry – the answers are yes and yes. But it’s always nice to get a case study to support it, especially when there’s solid quantitative data. So here we go.

Most of the clients I work with have their own opt-in house lists. But once in a while I have a client who has both opt-in (permission-based) and not-opt-in (not-permission-based) email addresses on their file. This provides a perfect opportunity to compare performance head-to-head, since both segments of the list have received all the same email messages; the only difference is how they came on the file.

What is the difference between opt-in and not-opt-in?

“If your subscribers permitted you to send them emails by subscribing or by ticking a box, then it’s an opt-in email list. However, if you obtained email lists but not the permission to send emails, then it is not an opt-in email list.” (Source: Campaign Monitor)

This is a case study from 2021; the client is a not-for-profit organization. This data is from a campaign they did in 2020; a big part of optimization is analyzing past performance to identify strengths and weaknesses. This analysis was a part of that process.

The goal of this email campaign was to drive a non-revenue conversion; in other words, they wanted the people they were emailing to take an action that did not require them to buy anything. It was a simple action that happened on the organization’s website.

Since the goal is a conversion, let’s start by looking at their business key performance indicator (KPI): conversion rate from sent.

The aqua color represents the opt-in or permission-based list segment, while the red represents the not opt-in, or not-permission-based, list segment.

As you can see in the bars, the send quantities are nearly the same for each send, roughly half their list is not opt-in.

But the conversion rates are not the same.

For the first send, the conversion rate for the opt-in list segment delivered a conversion that was seventeen-times (17X) the conversion rate that the not-opt-in list delivered.

We saw a dramatic decrease in conversion rates for both segments with the second send, but we still saw a marked difference in performance between the two list segments. Here the permission-based list segment performed seven-times (7X) better than the not-permission-based segment.

Overall, for both sends combined, the opt-in segment delivered a conversion rate twenty-one-times (21X) that of the not-opt-in segment.  

Bottom line: in this campaign, the permission-based list segment converted at a much higher rate than the not-permission-based list segment. You can choose which data point to use, seven-times (7X) better, seventeen-times (17X) better, or twenty-one-times (21X) better.

As if that’s not enough, let’s look at the diagnostic metrics associated with these sends.

Once again, the aqua represents the Opt-in list, or permission-based, segment, while the red represents the not-opt-in, or not-permission-based, list segment.

And once again, we see the opt-in list segment outperforming the not-opt-in list segment.

For the first send, the permission-based segment delivered three-times (3X) the open rate of the not-permission based segment in the first send. Click-through rates (CTR) show an even more dramatic difference; the permission-based segment delivered nine-times (9X) that of the not-permission-based segment.

The second send tells a similar story, although not quite as pronounced. Here the open rate of the permission-based segment is half again as large as the not-permission based segment. And the variance in the CTR? The CTR delivered by the opt-in list segment is four-times (4X) that of the not-opt-in list segment.

Overall, for both sends, the opt-in list segment open rate was twice (2X) that of the not-opt-in list segment. And the CTR for the permission-based segment was eight-times (8X) that of the not-permission based segment.

Bottom line: in this campaign, the permission-based list segment delivered open rates that were up to three-times (3X) those of the not-permission based list segment. Click-through rates for the permission-based list segment were up to nine-times (9X) higher than those for the not-permission-based list segment.  

So, going back to the questions at the beginning of the post:

Do opt-in email lists really perform better than non-opt-In lists?

Yes, they do.

And, if they do, is the difference significant?

Yes, it is. The business metric (KPI) measured here was conversion rate (CR); the conversion rate for the opt-in list segment was seven-times (7X) to twenty-one-times (21X) that of the not-opt-in list segment.

One reason for this difference in CR is that the diagnostic metrics for the opt-in lists also bested those of the not-opt-in lists. Open rate for the opt-in list segment was up to triple (3X) that of the not-opt-in list segment. The opt-in list also delivered a CTR up to nine-times (9X) that of the not-opt-in list.

Add in the fact that not-permission-based lists put you at a higher rate for spam complaints, deliverability issues, and block-listing, and you get the full picture.

It’s a business decision. Which type of list growth would you choose?

My advice? Choose Opt-in. And let me know how it goes.

Be safe, stay well, peace,

jj

Photo by Milana Jovanov on Unsplash

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Check Also

case-study:-63%-lift-in-revenue-from-a-simple-subject-line-test

Case Study: 63% Lift in Revenue from a Simple Subject Line Test

If you’ve been following me and reading my posts, you know that I’m not a big fan of subject line testing. It’s not that testing subject lines isn’t a good thing to do. It’s because many email marketers ONLY test subject lines, because it’s pretty much the easiest thing to test. Subject line tests can boost performance, but they rarely provide a significant boost with…

>